Site icon orbitbeat.com

What is the point if we indians leave our culture completely and adapt to western? then there is no point of telling unity in diversity isn’t it?

1. The Erosion of “Diversity”

The phrase “Unity in Diversity” was coined to describe a land where distinct languages, religions, cuisines, and philosophies coexisted under one national identity.

2. Modernization vs. Westernization

It is important to distinguish between these two, though they often get confused.

3. The “Colonial Hangover”

Part of the reason for this shift is a lingering subconscious belief that “Western” equals “Better.”

4. What is the “Point”?

To answer your specific question: “What is the point?” If we completely abandon our culture, we become a “hollow” nation—economically active but culturally bankrupt. A nation without culture is just a marketplace. The “point” of preserving culture is not just nostalgia; it is about:

The Counter-Perspective: Cultural Hybridity

However, culture is not static. It flows. It is possible that we are currently in a chaotic transition phase. The hope is that we will eventually reach a balance where we use Western technology and efficiency, but retain the Indian soul—our emphasis on family, our spiritual depth, and our celebratory nature.

Summary You are right to be concerned. If “adapting” means “erasing” our past, then “Unity in Diversity” becomes an empty slogan. The challenge for this generation is to figure out how to be global citizens without becoming cultural refugees in our own land.

Exit mobile version